no ellis will still be better because the pacers will soon bench granger and start troy murphy or mike dunlevue, then he will lose even more playing time and when its all said and done ellis will still be the better one
3 Answers · Sports · 19/02/2007
Kidd for Granger is good value for you since Kidd is way past his prime...
5 Answers · Sports · 08/11/2008
You could trade kidd for granger because you still have iverson and then crawford who will put up big scoring numbers. Only problem with that is your assists will go down a lot.
4 Answers · Sports · 02/11/2008
no. wade, gay, and horford are all young and talented. so are granger and roy, but davis ruins the trade he is old and is ALWAYS injured. don't take it it's like 3 for 2
3 Answers · Sports · 11/02/2009
That s a no brainer... YES!!! Jason Kidd is old, tired and weak. Danny Granger is a stud who is still getting better. He helps 8 categories consistently.
3 Answers · Sports · 08/11/2008
no way...too much for mediocre players....offer him smith only for Granger and Turk
1 Answers · Sports · 23/11/2008
All three of those players should not be in your free agent pool. You have a very good team. If you are in first place and can afford the space you might want to stash away Richardson or Jefferson but they are both out for quite some time yet.
6 Answers · Sports · 27/01/2007
10 that should be in are Wade Boozer Roy Mcgrady Smith Okafor Cassell Kaman Richardson and Villanueva
3 Answers · Sports · 30/01/2007
Grant Hill injuries rob him of his prime he was a beast putting up triple doubles like it was nothing.
6 Answers · Sports · 27/02/2012