Sort by
- Relevance
- |Time
No nuclear weapon could destroy an entire country (unless it is a tiny country like the Vatican...small US state like New Jersey. The true devastation of nuclear weapons isn't so much the sheer physical force - it's the fact that they utterly destroy...
6 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 11/01/2019
... every passing decade we developed more and more advanced nuclear weapons that terrified the soviets and maintained superior first...
11 Answers · Politics & Government · 13/08/2019
The problem with getting rid of nuclear weapons is you have to make sure no one is secretly hiding a few and no...
4 Answers · Politics & Government · 30/10/2019
No Latin American country had nuclear weapons either before or after the treaty, though some countries, such as Brazil...
7 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 27/05/2019
...that North Korea and Iran can intimidate their non-nuclear neighbors, either for their own ends or as proxies...
4 Answers · Politics & Government · 07/05/2019
... in the deaths of millions within a few years. Nuclear weapons, of which one can destroy an entire city in a blink of an eye, outright renders...
11 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 14/05/2019
... them, they've got formidable armies and are nuclear powers. Are you suggesting nuclear war to take them...
8 Answers · Politics & Government · 22/04/2019
There is a huge difference between peaceful nuclear power plants versus weapons grade nuclear explosives. Saudi Arabia is getting the former, not the latter.
6 Answers · Politics & Government · 21/02/2019
The meeting of Trump and Kim has MADE no progress in THE abandonment OF nuclear weapons.
2 Answers · Society & Culture · 01/07/2019
Using Nuclear weapons is not something to be thought of carelessly...'s part in the war. Any use of nuclear weapons would bring howls of complaints on...
25 Answers · Travel · 10/07/2019