Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. No nuclear weapon could destroy an entire country (unless it is a tiny country like the Vatican...small US state like New Jersey. The true devastation of nuclear weapons isn't so much the sheer physical force - it's the fact that they utterly destroy...

    6 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 11/01/2019

  2. ... every passing decade we developed more and more advanced nuclear weapons that terrified the soviets and maintained superior first...

    11 Answers · Politics & Government · 13/08/2019

  3. The problem with getting rid of nuclear weapons is you have to make sure no one is secretly hiding a few and no...

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 30/10/2019

  4. No Latin American country had nuclear weapons either before or after the treaty, though some countries, such as Brazil...

    7 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 27/05/2019

  5. ...that North Korea and Iran can intimidate their non-nuclear neighbors, either for their own ends or as proxies...

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 07/05/2019

  6. ... in the deaths of millions within a few years. Nuclear weapons, of which one can destroy an entire city in a blink of an eye, outright renders...

    11 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 14/05/2019

  7. ... them, they've got formidable armies and are nuclear powers. Are you suggesting nuclear war to take them...

    8 Answers · Politics & Government · 22/04/2019

  8. There is a huge difference between peaceful nuclear power plants versus weapons grade nuclear explosives. Saudi Arabia is getting the former, not the latter.

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 21/02/2019

  9. The meeting of Trump and Kim has MADE no progress in THE abandonment OF nuclear weapons.

    2 Answers · Society & Culture · 01/07/2019

  10. Using Nuclear weapons is not something to be thought of carelessly...'s part in the war. Any use of nuclear weapons would bring howls of complaints on...

    25 Answers · Travel · 10/07/2019

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers