The whole country should have high speed rail . Spending money on infrastructure is a good thing. It boosts...
20 Answers · Politics & Government · 11/01/2015
...future contributions Cons: The people of California voted against it in a referendum No economic case...will be cheaper and faster to fly than to use the high speed rail line
3 Answers · Politics & Government · 18/08/2010
...they are fun? Con -With California 's already over taxed power grid (rolling blackouts from time to time, etc) high speed rail would be just one more plug in to an already ...
5 Answers · Politics & Government · 08/10/2011
I can see Californias future on green energy right now. All power except maybe to...air conditioners etc allowed. Those high speed trains which need electricity to run would be rusting...
13 Answers · Politics & Government · 01/10/2012
... reasons: 1. California and Florida ...in the red states-- higher rates of unplanned pregnancy.... 2. High speed rail is our future...
14 Answers · Politics & Government · 02/01/2011
...would be fantastic. I think they should replace all of Amtrac with highspeed rail all across the country. It would save energy, fuel and be completely carbon free ...
6 Answers · Politics & Government · 08/07/2008
...often to visit friends/family. Richmond does NOT need a high - speed rail . More over the eventual costs would outweigh any benefit it could provide.
11 Answers · Politics & Government · 01/11/2011
I don't care what they do. Will this train come from Mexico?
15 Answers · Politics & Government · 08/03/2013
Flooding California with illegals on welfare is a much better use of funds than improving transportation.
6 Answers · Politics & Government · 15/01/2018