Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. Note that it says the United States Border Patrol not the Arizona Border Patrol...

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 04/08/2010

  2. ... on the USA side. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976) was a...

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 03/07/2010

  3. ... Court: U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. MARTINEZ-FUERTE, 428 U.S. 543 (1976) 428 U...

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 08/12/2010

  4. ...that immigration checkpoints are constitutional. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Martinez-Fuerte

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 17/11/2013

  5. ...a good discussion on this check out the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Martinez-Fuertes, 414 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1975...

    8 Answers · Politics & Government · 24/08/2007

  6. This is just stupid. If the person is in possession of illegal drugs, that affect their status, wouldn't you say? Are we suppose to just assume they are not? If the dog doesn't hit on them, we DO Assume they are not...

    8 Answers · Politics & Government · 18/12/2011

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers