Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. ...that immigration checkpoints are constitutional. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Martinez-Fuerte

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 17/11/2013

  2. This is just stupid. If the person is in possession of illegal drugs, that affect their status, wouldn't you say? Are we suppose to just assume they are not? If the dog doesn't hit on them, we DO Assume they are not...

    8 Answers · Politics & Government · 18/12/2011

  3. ... Court: U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. MARTINEZ-FUERTE, 428 U.S. 543 (1976) 428 U...

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 08/12/2010

  4. Note that it says the United States Border Patrol not the Arizona Border Patrol...

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 04/08/2010

  5. ... on the USA side. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976) was a...

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 03/07/2010

  6. ...a good discussion on this check out the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Martinez-Fuertes, 414 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1975...

    8 Answers · Politics & Government · 24/08/2007

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers