Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. ... by the military. You see in the SCOTUS case United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) the US government argued 4 ...

    14 Answers · Politics & Government · 26/02/2018

  2. ...without opinion. It was appealed directly to the United States Supreme Court from the Appellate Department...

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 24/04/2007

  3. ...be construed to authorize congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens .... from keeping their own...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 07/02/2013

  4. ... gun ownership outside of militia membership. Take United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) the US government argued 4 ...

    13 Answers · Politics & Government · 23/02/2018

  5. ...of Congress and the national government, not that of the state. United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939): The National Firearms...

    11 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 11/01/2011

  6. ..., the Supreme Court's 1939 decision in United States v. Miller was widely understood to have endorsed that view. The...

    11 Answers · Politics & Government · 07/02/2011

  7. There are two reasons for passing a tax law. One is to increase revenue for the government, the other is to make the taxed conduct less common. The NFA was clearly not a revenue increasing act. A transfer tax of $200 on...

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 09/01/2010

  8. ...a liberal mis-reading and disinformation of the court case. United States V Miller, I believe 1934 or 37. at the moment I can not recall the correct date...

    19 Answers · Politics & Government · 26/09/2006

  9. ... justified." Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1. "These principles apply as well to an officer...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 10/11/2010

  10. ...-Regulated Militia.” In United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, 179 (1939) , we explained that “the Militia...

    29 Answers · Politics & Government · 27/05/2009

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers