Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. ... limited info. but this is what I came up with on Miller v Texas MILLER-EL V. COCKRELL 2003 http...

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 31/08/2009

  2. ... Thomas Miller-El certiorari a second time (MILLER-EL v. DRETKE, No. 03-9659), in order to address whether the U.S...

    2 Answers · Education & Reference · 31/08/2009

  3. The Miller decision was only tangentially related to the ... is indeed an individual right, not a collective or State's right. It also said that the right to bear...

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 11/12/2008

  4. ....S. 252 (1886) UNITED STATES v. MILLER, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) Shelly... the best security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear ...

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 26/04/2010

  5. ...'s subsequent Second Amendment cases, United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), and District of Columbia v...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 30/05/2009

  6. 2003 it means they made an awesome decision "it rules"

    1 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 31/08/2009

  7. The United States v. the 2nd Amendment.

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 29/11/2008

  8. Here read it- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 21/03/2009

  9. ...of months have been fighting about background checks, and Miller wouldn't come up in that discussion.

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 23/04/2013

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers