Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. According to the Supreme Court in United States v. Miller, (1939), The Court cannot take judicial notice that a shotgun...

    12 Answers · Politics & Government · 25/08/2018

  2. ... gun ownership outside of militia membership. Take United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) the US government argued 4 ...

    13 Answers · Politics & Government · 23/02/2018

  3. ... by the military. You see in the SCOTUS case United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) the US government argued 4 ...

    14 Answers · Politics & Government · 26/02/2018

  4. Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 22/12/2017

  5. ... of thousands of other surnames, and for every county in every state in the USA.) https://www.ancestry.com/boards/surnames...

    1 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 30/10/2017

  6. ...there are also: "Still Life Portraits by F.V." ; "Ron T. Landscapes", and so on.

    1 Answers · Business & Finance · 22/02/2017

  7. ...pretty clear when it comes to weapons ownership. In United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) The government argued 4 points...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 10/10/2016

  8. NO! In United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) the government... for the good of the United States, who could serve as members of a militia...

    20 Answers · Politics & Government · 06/07/2016

  9. United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), was a Supreme Court case...

    2 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 05/04/2017

  10. ...look-at-the-data/ Then there is the fact that in the United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) the government argued 4 points and...

    10 Answers · Politics & Government · 12/10/2015

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers