Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. ... rights activists say that it explicitly says that the state has the right to disallow citizens to possess certain types of...

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 30/11/2012

  2. ...'s subsequent Second Amendment cases, United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), and District of Columbia v...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 30/05/2009

  3. ...of months have been fighting about background checks, and Miller wouldn't come up in that discussion.

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 23/04/2013

  4. NO! In United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) the government... for the good of the United States, who could serve as members of a militia...

    20 Answers · Politics & Government · 06/07/2016

  5. According to the Supreme Court in United States v. Miller, (1939), The Court cannot take judicial notice that a shotgun...

    12 Answers · Politics & Government · 25/08/2018

  6. Different states, different laws, here I can tool around in the care with one on the seat...

    13 Answers · Politics & Government · 26/06/2008

  7. ...-Regulated Militia.” In United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, 179 (1939) , we explained that “the Militia...

    29 Answers · Politics & Government · 27/05/2009

  8. .... 252 , refutes the individual-rights interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174 , does not limit the right to keep and bear ...

    19 Answers · Politics & Government · 19/02/2013

  9. ... war were privately owned. In United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) the government argued 4 points and...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 04/09/2014

  10. Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 22/12/2017

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers