Yahoo Web Search

  1. no, it is not longer in effect : Schneider v . Rusk , 377 U.S. 163 (1964) Angelika Schneider was...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 10/02/2010

  2. ... v . U.S., 343 U.S. 717) (1952). In Schneider v . Rusk 377 U.S. 163 (1964), the US Supreme Court ...

    8 Answers · Politics & Government · 07/08/2010

  3. you will not lose your us citizenship... Schneider v . Rusk 1964.. look it up.. she is affraid of losing you thats all

    6 Answers · Family & Relationships · 27/03/2011

  4. ... v . Rusk ), moving abroad following naturalization ( Schneider v . Rusk ), and desertion from the armed forced during wartime (Trop v . ...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 23/01/2009

  5. ... v . U.S., 343 U.S. 717) (1952). In Schneider v . Rusk 377 U.S. 163 (1964), the US Supreme Court ...

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 20/08/2011

  6. ... v . U.S., 343 U.S. 717) (1952). In Schneider v . Rusk 377 U.S. 163 (1964), the US Supreme Court ...

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 28/11/2009

  7. ... v . Brownell (1958) Trop v . Dulles (1958) Schneider v . Rusk (1964) Afroyim v . Rusk (1967) Rogers v . Bellei...

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 13/11/2010

  8. ...citizen is eligible to be President. Art. II, s 1. Schneider v . Rusk (1964) If you are right, where are the prominent conservative ...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 16/12/2010

  9. "illegal is illegal" means everything to them, but "legal is legal" means nothing

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 13/05/2011

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers