Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. You are right, Minor v. Happersett holds that natural born Citizens are not defined by...

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 27/12/2010

  2. Minor v. Happersett (1875) Virginia Minor who, in Minor v Happersett...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 25/12/2009

  3. 1874, Supreme Court case Minor v. Happersett noted that "citizenship has not in all cases been...

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 09/12/2009

  4. ...: I'm not making things up. Minor, which isn't a citizenship case at all, was superceded... (1898). As applied in Ankeny v. Daniels in 2009 http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 20/08/2010

  5. ...citizen parents. It was also defined the same way in MINOR v. HAPPERSETT http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=88&invol=162...

    10 Answers · Politics & Government · 10/01/2009

  6. The reason for the 14th amendment was to ensure that all slaves were indeed citizens of this country and prevent states from passing laws that would have made it impossible for former slaves to prove that they were indeed...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 17/03/2011

  7. ...and national levels to achieve the vote. It effectively overruled Minor v. Happersett, in which a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the ...

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 18/11/2012

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers