Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. ... rights activists say that it explicitly says that the state has the right to disallow citizens to possess certain types of...

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 30/11/2012

  2. ...of months have been fighting about background checks, and Miller wouldn't come up in that discussion.

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 23/04/2013

  3. Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 22/12/2017

  4. NO! In United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939) the...bear arms for the good of the United States, who could serve as members...

    20 Answers · Politics & Government · 06/07/2016

  5. ...’s two-volume History of the United States During the Administration... Jackson (Robert V. Remini’s The Life...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 20/01/2010

  6. ... Court's subsequent Second Amendment cases, United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), and District of Columbia v...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 30/05/2009

  7. Not according to the supreme court at the time. Miller V. United States ruled that it was constitutional. I disagree with that personally. ...

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 21/07/2010

  8. According to the Supreme Court in United States v. Miller, (1939), The Court cannot take judicial notice that a shotgun...

    12 Answers · Politics & Government · 25/08/2018

  9. Different states, different laws, here I can tool around in the care... thing is everyone was for it except the United Brotherhood of Organized Crooks...

    13 Answers · Politics & Government · 26/06/2008

  10. 1,2,3, and 4. See Miller, Heller, and McDonald v. United States cases. Individuals can own military-type weapons as it ...

    8 Answers · Politics & Government · 10/01/2013

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers