Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. Not exactly. Miller v. California redefined the test for obscenity. Prior to this case material was...

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 13/11/2014

  2. ...the material the bookstores are selling unsuitable. In the California v. Miller case, Miller was found guilty because the material he was...

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 13/12/2012

  3. Miller v California helps establish what is considered obscene...of the utmost importance in a democracy. As for Roe v. Wade, it was very important, but you can argue that it...

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 16/03/2010

  4. ... as to how and when communities could regulate obscene materials. Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S. Ct. 2607, 37 L. Ed. 2d...

    7 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 05/03/2012

  5. ... a jury trial, he was convicted of violating California Penal Code 311.2 (a), a misdemeanor, by knowingly distributing...

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 24/04/2007

  6. ...unprotected by the First Amendment. http://www.answers.com/topic/miller-v-california-1 http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/history/roth-v-united-...

    3 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 08/08/2013

  7. D) Roe v. Wade. It was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. I hope this helps.

    1 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 26/11/2012

  8. It's C. The other person is wrong Plessy v. Ferguson went to the Supreme Court in 1896, and...

    1 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 03/06/2009

  9. ... this protective purpose and is constitutionally adequate.... " "MILLER v. CALIFORNIA", SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED ...

    6 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 25/04/2007

  10. ...: The Miller test was developed in the 1973 case Miller v. California.[1] It has three parts: Whether the average person...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 07/02/2009

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers