...: Cedar Lane, Matagorda, Texas... Community Williams, Anderson d 1962 Williams..., Helen V. d 1988 Williams, ...
1 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 10/07/2009
Define "lost the debate?" Did Craig provide any evidence any claimed god exists? No. Did he show that logical arguments for god are *not* fallacious and worthless? No. Did he manage to show any evidence of any kind that magic...
4 Answers · Society & Culture · 20/05/2012
He's not afraid. He has better things to do. and Dawkins is a brilliant man, probably way over your head. Evolution is a fact.
18 Answers · Society & Culture · 18/11/2010
im not angry at all. note; atheism has no leader.
22 Answers · Society & Culture · 24/10/2011
Why people watch sport or debate instead of Play sport and do Debate?
1 Answers · Society & Culture · 26/11/2011
Hypocritical slanderers is all. They know they couldn't stand before him in a debate, so they try to piece together little snippets out of context to make him seem immoral. Just a bunch of cowards
11 Answers · Society & Culture · 08/07/2012
Because, when people are passionate about a subject, they will tend to hear and see what they like, that is, they will filter their experiences. That does not mean that what is filtered out is too threatening for their...
4 Answers · Society & Culture · 30/11/2011
from what i understant dawkins in a fraud. he is known liar. and he uses other people to confabulate false doctrines. remember this! all scientists that preach evolution are liars. either that or they are part of knowing conspiracy to overthrow christ and truth...
19 Answers · Society & Culture · 28/11/2012
Dawkins debating Craig would be like Lawrence Krauss debating Elmer Fudd. It would not only be a waste of time and money, but an exercise in futility as well. There is nothing to gain by debating a door nail.
12 Answers · Society & Culture · 18/05/2010