Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. Kelo vs. New London (2205) is a landmark case as it redefined... that it was NOT unconstitutional for New London to have done so; the Supreme Court...

    1 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 20/11/2008

  2. ... the Ohio Constitution, (1) rejected Kelo’s rationale that takings for economic development are a “public use...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 15/03/2008

  3. ... a development plan that included a resort hotel and conference center, a new state park, 80–100 new residences (which is now down to a mix of 14...

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 16/11/2007

  4. ...leftist cretins on the Court. Kelo is an outrage. Not only ... at a low amount. The city of New London then basically gave the land to ...

    1 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 06/02/2010

  5. Of course, Kelo was an activist decision! The Constitution clearly states...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 12/01/2008

  6. In my opinion, Kelo v. New London was the only one out of these three the Court got right. ...

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 23/10/2008

  7. False. The Supreme Court upheld New London's decision to do exactly that, on the grounds that "promoting...

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 27/10/2014

  8. Yes, they were wrong. The only positive aspect was they left it up to communities to limit that interpretation.

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 16/02/2007

  9. ...Kelo v. City of New London. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._New_London A developer wanted some land to build a new business center. People...

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 04/05/2009

  10. Kelo v. City of New London was about eminent domain, which is only in the 5th Amendment...

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 03/12/2012

  1. Ad
    related to Kelo v. New London
  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers