Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. ... out of context... distort their meaning http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Quirin The validity of Quirin as a basis for the use of military ...

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 05/01/2014

  2. in all ways shapes and forms your posting is full of falsehoods right off the bat the constitution of the United States DOES NOT DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN GOOD...

    4 Answers · Politics & Government · 05/01/2014

  3. You little rascals are so cute when you make up this big talk

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 05/01/2014

  4. Members of the Democratic Party, Libertarian Party, Green Party, and any other non-Republicans are subject to capture and detention as prisoners of war by opposing military forces. LOL...

    2 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 05/01/2014

  5. Try this site: http://www.oyez.org/ This is just US Supreme court Cases, I think.

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 07/09/2007

  6. .../libref/historic/famcases/nazi/nazi.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Quirin http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9515/wwii.html http://www.google.com/search?q...

    2 Answers · Education & Reference · 12/05/2008

  7. Bush CAN hold a military tribunal. That's not what the SCOTUS ruling was about. If Bush had charged these men with an offense and held a military tribunal to convict them there would not have been an...

    6 Answers · Politics & Government · 16/06/2008

  8. ....S. citizen. In its decision in the case, titled Ex Parte Quirin, the Supreme Court held that the trials by tribunal...

    14 Answers · Politics & Government · 26/06/2006

  9. ... guilty of killing innocent civilians while not in uniform. Ex parte Quirin and Ex parte Milligan both state that these are war crimes...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 30/10/2006

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers