Yahoo Web Search

  1. ...and took their case to the United States Supreme Court, where two... down. In CHEROKEE NATION V . GEORGIA (1831), the court was...

    4 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 22/02/2009

  2. ... Rabbit Creek on September...decision (Johnson v . M Intosh) which stated that Indians could... within the United States , but could...

    1 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 11/05/2009

  3. ...the Congress of the United States passed the "...independent Cherokee Nation . At first the... Nation v . Georgia, the ...

    7 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 11/09/2007

  4. ... Rabbit Creek on September...decision (Johnson v . M'Intosh) which stated that Indians could... within the United States , but could...

    5 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 14/06/2009

  5. ...and took their case to the United States Supreme Court, where two... down. In CHEROKEE NATION V . GEORGIA (1831), the court was...

    3 Answers · Social Science · 08/11/2008

  6. ...the Congress of the United States passed the "...independent Cherokee Nation . At first the... Nation v . Georgia, the ...

    2 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 20/10/2007

  7. ...quot;Nunna daul Tsuny"). Ironically, just as the Creeks killed Chief McIntosh for signing the Treaty...

    2 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 18/11/2010

  8. ... Removal, Cherokee Nation v . Georgia, and Trail of Tears..., by the Confederate States of America. Other ...

    6 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 13/12/2010

  9. ... Nation v . Georgia [1831] ...that the Indian nation was neither a State in the Union nor a...sovereignty and dominion of the United States , and that they...

    5 Answers · Politics & Government · 16/12/2008

  10. ... Rabbit Creek on September...decision (Johnson v . M'Intosh) which stated that Indians could... within the United States , but could...

    3 Answers · Social Science · 16/02/2009

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers