Yahoo Web Search

  1. Sort by

  1. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme ...

    3 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 15/07/2011

  2. "United States" is the entire name of a party, and so it should not be abbreviated.

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 24/11/2010

  3. ...: BAKER ET AL. v. CARR...., 369 U.S. 186 (1962...complaint's allegations.../Baker_Carr...Baker-v-Carr

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 30/09/2007

  4. Baker v. Carr: The U.S. Supreme Court rules that federal courts can...

    7 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 23/08/2011

  5. Baker v. Carr (1962... underrepresented. Mayor Baker of Nashville brought.... The Court's Decision In a 6-2...

    3 Answers · Education & Reference · 11/10/2006

  6. Baker v. Carr, case decided in 1962 by the U.S. Supreme ...legislative apportionment.~ 377 U.S. 533 (1964), argued...case of Reynolds v. Sims, with the opinion...

    1 Answers · Politics & Government · 10/02/2009

  7. ...which could have granted relief for Baker, but instead the Supreme ...to achieve a compromise~ Barron v. Mayor of Baltimore, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243 (1833) ...

    2 Answers · Politics & Government · 10/02/2009

  8. In the landmark case Lochner v. New York (1908) the US Supreme Court ruled that bakers could not go on strike and must accept lower wages to prevent starvation throughout the city.

    2 Answers · Education & Reference · 04/06/2009

  9. ...." -- Justice Frankfurter, dissenting opinion in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 270 (1962).

    3 Answers · Politics & Government · 12/12/2006

  10. Too much info this sight may help: http://www.u-s-history.com/ addams-hull house rockerfeller-oil....P. Morgan-biggest banker in U.S. at the time late 18th century and even up to the...

    2 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 15/03/2010

  1. Try asking your question on Yahoo Answers