# Yahoo Web Search

related to ACE

1. Sort by

1. ### need help for this power series question coming up for a final I have. It says find the radius of convergence?

b) Your series is essentially a geometric series. So use the formula 1 + z + z^2 + ...+ z^n + ...= 1/(1-z) when | z | < 1. Begin by rewriting the series to get it into desired form: x^3/8 + x^5/64 + ...+ x^(2n+1)/8^n + ..... ....= x^3/8{1 + x^2/8 + ...+ (x^2/8)^(n-1...

1 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 29/06/2014

2. ### Calculus III?

It's a progression from the first two courses. If you aced Calculus I and II, you should have no trouble with III as long as you put in the same level of work.

2 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 13/07/2014

3. ### A card is selected at random from a standard 52-card deck. What is the probability that is an ace or a heart?

There's 13 hearts. There's 3 aces that aren't hearts. So, there's 16 favorable cards, in a set of 52 cards. The chance of drawing them are 16/52 = 4/13

1 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 07/04/2014

4. ### PROBABILITY WITH CARDS QUESTION?

...7,8,9,10,J,K,Q,A (8 cards: assuming ace is higher than 6). There are 4 suites. 8x4...

2 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 08/04/2014

5. ### Calculus: derivstives?

... y/2 = 1/x => y = 2/x Pythagoras' formula on Δ ACE: L² = (x+1)² + (2/x+ 2)² derive (L²)' = 2(x+1...

1 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 29/03/2014

6. ### probability and poker?

The probability is the same. All that matters is that you are dealt two cards, and you have zero information about the other 50. If you're alone you get cards 1 and 2. But the probability is the same for all...

1 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 21/01/2014

7. ### probability and poker?

The odds are the same no matter how many opponents there are. The deck does not know or care what you do with the other 50 cards . .

1 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 21/01/2014

8. ### Failing grade 11 math!! Help?

... will be fine. You can ask teacher or anyone for help. You can ace it. You can do all things through Jesus Christ who...

4 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 23/12/2013

9. ### Fermat's Proof and a Directional derivative proof?

2) Let u = (r, s) where r and s are both not 0. So, D_αu f(a, b) = lim(h→0) [f(a + αrh, b + αsh) - f(a, b)] / (h ||αu||) = lim(h→0) [f(a + αrh, b + αsh) - f(a, b)] / (αh ||u||), since α > 0 = lim(k→0) [f(a + rk, b + sk) - f(a, b)] / (k ||u||), letting k = αh = lim(k→0) [f(a + rk, b + sk) - f(a, b...

1 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 12/12/2013

10. ### Fermat's Proof and a Directional Derivative Proof?

The second should be easy because the directional derivative ONLY involves a direction, NOT an amplitude. By multiplying by a scalar you only change the magnitude, not the direction (unless α is negative in which case you just negate the directional derivative--but we don't...

1 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 12/12/2013